Re: Common Objects

Jeff Sonstein ([email protected])
Mon, 29 May 1995 15:25:36 -0700


[email protected] (Robert DiFalco) writes:

>[...] my basic point is that I
>have no problem with the concept of caching. Where I disagree is to *where*
>functionality for caching should be enabled. To me, caching functionality is
>the responsibility of clients or servers and not objects. Objects should be
>dumb.

hear, hear...

>[...] if the idea of defaults is going
>to be introduced to the spec (and I'm not all that certain they should be),
>it should be completely isolated from the concept of caching. Not that they
>couldn't work together, but conceptually they should be isolated and
>encapsulated

hear, hear, HEAR... differing issues, differing porpoises...

Jeff Sonstein, Networks Administrator
New College of California
50 Fell Street
San Francisco CA 94102
[415] 241-1302 ext. 490