Re: 4vectors

Mark Waks ([email protected])
Thu, 25 May 95 13:07:32 EDT


Andrew writes:
>Get ready to be surprised, then, because I see no other way to provide a
>multi-user environment. There has to be a network of servers which would
>update clients based on the changes made by other clients. See IRC.

See previous argument. As I've said many, many times, a decent
multi-user system is going to have to minimize server usage as
far as possible, and have far more intelligent clients inter-
communicating. I simply don't believe that a naive server-push
system (like current MUDs) will suffice for a VRMUD...

>BTW: Assuming that the Server is the bottleneck is not very thourough.
> [...]
>You could then replace the PCs with high speed workstations, and the
>bottleneck would still be the Ethernet. Bottlenecks occur everywhere.
>It's a big system.

Point taken. Nonetheless, the heart of my point remains: the best way
to avoid these bottlenecks is to put maximum intelligence on the local
system, and minimize the central intelligence and communications paths,
as far as is reasonable...

-- Justin

Random Quote du Jour:

"She tried making a serious statement, but it ended up looking like spaghetti
Bolognaise with bad breath and a quiff..."
-- from Tyranny Rex