SPEC - Re: Text Proposal
Anthony Parisi ([email protected])
Tue, 25 Apr 1995 15:12:03 -0400
>> > I have not included an annotation flag. I think this is an important
>> > issue but it would be a mistake to overload the functionality of this
>node
>> > with annotation.
>>
>> Is it that it makes the node too complex, or that the existing Inventor
>> node doesn't handle annotation text? Somehow it doesn't seem to me that
>> adding one boolean to the node overloads it too much. However, leaving
>it
>> off of the spec. hampers text usage for a lot of serious applications.
>
>My concern is overloading of functionality. Annotation text would behave
>much differently than 3D text. I'm not against annotation at all, I'd
>just like to separate it from this text node.
>
I guess I could live with that, too. Could you make a specific proposal,
such as AsciiText2 (annotation) and AsciiText3 (what you're calling AsciiText)?
____________________________________________________________________________
Intervista Software
Internet Visualization
415 648-2749
Tony Parisi
President [email protected]
____________________________________________________________________________