Re: VRML Usenet newsgroup
Brian Behlendorf ([email protected])
Mon, 17 Apr 1995 14:50:24 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 17 Apr 1995, James Waldrop wrote:
> Andy Norris wrote:
> >Who disagrees with trying to create comp.graphics.vrml.design and
> >comp.graphics.vrml.users?
>
> why not comp.infosystems? i realize consistency is the haven
> of little minds, but i'm going on 30+ hours with no sleep and
> a little consistency is just what i need right about now. :)
Because "vrml" is not an "infosystem", even though it is (will be) a part of
the "www". It is a 3-d description language for computer graphics, which has
the nice benefit of being very network-friendly. Thus, comp.graphics.vrml
seems the best place to start.
Brian