Sounds like a great idea to me.
>I'm the VP of Marketing for TGS and I can guarantee you that TGS wants a
>standard VRML to succeed. Making casual statements about anybody on
>a negative basis will slow down the process.
When processes move too fast, people make mistakes. I don't want
VRML 2.0 to take two years, but I don't think it should be done in
3 months, either. I'm sure there's a happy medium in there somewhere.
I think part of my problem, Bob, was that your browser was VERY nice.
The inline VRML stuff especially. TGS is in a very good position to
dominate the VRML browser market just like Netscape does the HTML
browser market. I'm sure you're aware of this. :-)
As far as trust goes, I agree that good will should be extended. I'm
very much in favor of cooperative efforts among all of us. It's lone
ranger-style development I'm worried about.
James Waldrop (JLW3) \ [email protected] / Ubique, Inc.
Systems Administrator \ [email protected] / 657 Mission #601
http://www.ubique.com/ \ 415.896.2434 / San Francisco, CA