>I don't know about the whole PHIL thing (I was just reading :-) but I
>think that speculation on which MUD/MUSH/whatever is best is not
>appropriate for this list, at least not yet. In fact, this entire topic
>that I brought up may not be appropriate, and as such, I'm looking into
>starting a new mailing list with this concept in mind.
>However, I haven't heard one way or another from the VRML list moderators....
Speaking as a moderator, the right place to discuss the technical details of
implementation is *this* list. (I think.) I am a very very very very big
fan of PARC MOO (been running it for almost 2 years now), and think the
cross-fertilization of MOO and VRML is going to be exceptionally powerful.
So, as far as I'm concerned (Brian please speak up if you differ from me on
this), I'd like to see discussion take place here. Stylistic/design
discussion might need to move to another list.
That said, the comments made earlier today about "battles fought and won"
should not be ignored; a lot of this is not new territory - it was covered
last summer. Using that as a basis for discussion, I think the field is
pretty much wide open...
(Please keep in mind that this is not an open call for everyone's 2 cents
worth.)
Mark Pesce
VRML List Moderator