Re: VRML - The next step?

Andrew C. Esh ([email protected])
Tue, 4 Apr 1995 17:20:19 -0600 (CST)


On Tue, 4 Apr 1995, Alexander the Great wrote:

> *ahems* and steps up on the soap box:
>
> The differences between "MUD"s and MUSHs have been debated
> elsewhere by more qualified people then many on here (I'm not meaning to
> be deragatory as this sounds, simply stating that this forum has
> different expertise on the whole).

Hmm. Why is it this list allows this huge diatribe on the differences
between MUDs and MUSHs, and yet they go to all sorts of trouble to get rid
of those of use who want to discuss the philosophy of, and speculate on
the future uses of VRML? Nothing against it, but I'm feeling kind of
slighted. You could have saved us all the trouble and simply asked me to
shut up on the PHIL subject.

---
Andrew C. Esh                 mailto:[email protected]
Computer Network Technology   [email protected] (finger for PGP key)
6500 Wedgwood Road            612.550.8000 (main)
Maple Grove MN 55311          612.550.8229 (direct)
<A HREF="http://www.mtn.org/~andrewes">ACE Home Page</A>