Re: HTTP++

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Next message: Mauricio Aguilar Alvarez: "Re: two ideas..."
Previous message: [email&#160;protected] : "Re: two ideas..."
In reply to: <span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1a5e5c2d2d2a5b4e5a74697e7634787f7676377b6e7634797577">[email&#160;protected] : "HTTP++"
Next in thread: Simon Spero: "Re: HTTP++"

Daniel W. Connolly ([email protected])
Thu, 30 Nov 1995 08:06:56 -0500

In message <0031600001677773000002*@MHS>, [email protected] writes:
> Trying to dig in to the internet to get more info on HTTP++.

I don't think there's any actual proposal by that name. I think the
term HTTP++ was suggestive of an analogy with C/C++.

> By the way, can any one
> comment on HTTP-NG proposed by ETI? Is there a place for it in future
> or not?

Yes. We don't have a lot of public info on our HTTP-NG efforts, but they're
underway. For publicly available info on HTTP work at W3C, stay tuned to:

Dan