Re: bad-idea-of-the-day: Inline data as URL scheme?

Terry Allen ([email protected])
Fri, 1 Sep 1995 07:26:28 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Murray J Bent: "Inline data as URL"
Previous message: [email protected]: "Re: Another day, another idea: generic handling of fragment identifiers"

Re elements vs attributes: Gavin's right; you don't want the limit
on att length applied.

Re < / > & in the content: the only good solution is CDATA marked
sections, which most people dislike variously.

Re the whole idea: unneeded, doesn't obviously achieve much.

Regards,

-- Terry Allen ([email protected]) O'Reilly & Associates, Inc. Editor, Digital Media Group 101 Morris St. Sebastopol, Calif., 95472

A Davenport Group sponsor. For information on the Davenport Group see ftp://ftp.ora.com/pub/davenport/README.html or http://www.ora.com/davenport/README.html Current HTML 2.0 spec: ftp://ds.internic.net/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-html-spec-05.txt

Next message: Murray J Bent: "Inline data as URL"
Previous message: [email protected]: "Re: Another day, another idea: generic handling of fragment identifiers"