Re: bad-idea-of-the-day: Inline data as URL scheme?

Paul Burchard ([email protected])
Wed, 30 Aug 95 17:22:42 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Steven T. Roussey: "Re: bad-idea-of-the-day: Inline data as URL scheme?"
Previous message: Larry Masinter: "bad-idea-of-the-day: Inline data as URL scheme?"
Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "bad-idea-of-the-day: Inline data as URL scheme?"
Next in thread: Steven T. Roussey: "Re: bad-idea-of-the-day: Inline data as URL scheme?"

Larry Masinter <[email protected]> writes:
>
> data:<mimetype>,<encoding>,<encoded-value>

Cute, but is the overhead of the cid: scheme really so bad? I'd
much rather see a general multipart "Web media bundler" -- just
about every extension of the Web architecture I've thought about
would benefit from something like that.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Burchard <[email protected]>
``I'm still learning how to count backwards from infinity...''
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Next message: Steven T. Roussey: "Re: bad-idea-of-the-day: Inline data as URL scheme?"
Previous message: Larry Masinter: "bad-idea-of-the-day: Inline data as URL scheme?"
Maybe in reply to: Larry Masinter: "bad-idea-of-the-day: Inline data as URL scheme?"
Next in thread: Steven T. Roussey: "Re: bad-idea-of-the-day: Inline data as URL scheme?"