Re: EOLAS ACQUIRES MILLSTONE INTERNET SOFTWARE PATENT

Marc VanHeyningen ([email protected])
Mon, 21 Aug 1995 15:15:29 -0700

> As for the comment concerning the Z39.50 standards committee meeting, our
> claims relate specifically to embedded interactive program objects in World
> Wide Web documents, not just downloading executable code for general
> document rendering.

Say, can somebody produce prior art for the use of the Chinese Remainder
Theorem in World Wide Web documents? If not, does that mean I can patent
it?

(Does the patent specifically say "world wide web documents"? In precise
and legal terms, what is a "world wide web document" anyway? More
importantly, what isn't? Why is a document returned via Z39.50 not a
World Wide Web document?)