> Perhaps a similar syntax would be appropriate for client-side
> interpretation of URL fragment identifiers:
>
> http://foo.com/dir/foo.txt#lines=10-20
> ^
>
> The presence or absense of an '=' sign in the fragment would
> determine whether the fragment is an extended locator
> or an anchor name (or element ID in HTML 3).
I prefer this syntax as well -- it is both clearer and
more extensible than using a special character to indicate each
possible use for a fragment.
.....Roy Fielding ICS Grad Student, University of California, Irvine USA
<[email protected]>
<URL:http://www.ics.uci.edu/dir/grad/Software/fielding>