Re: <pre>

James Whitescarver ([email protected])
Thu, 6 Oct 1994 10:00:33 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: [email protected]: "Re: Problems with Location: URI and CGI"
Previous message: Sarr Blumson: "Re: <pre>"
Maybe in reply to: Sarr Blumson: "<pre>"
Next in thread: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: <pre>"

It is not clear to me that <pre> should ignore CR. I think this is a bug
in the our browsers. The intent of <pre> was that such things are NOT
ignored. The specs may be wrong too. :)

jim

Next message: [email protected]: "Re: Problems with Location: URI and CGI"
Previous message: Sarr Blumson: "Re: <pre>"
Maybe in reply to: Sarr Blumson: "<pre>"
Next in thread: Daniel W. Connolly: "Re: <pre>"