<Dave Raggett wrote:>
@ > That is, can I justifiably use the <HR> tag inside a <H#> tag? (#=1..6)
@
@ The answer is currently NO for html+ as HR is seen as a block like element.
In that case then is there any chance of making it so?
For example compare something like:
to:
Just from a presentation point of view I think that the 1st one looks a
little cleaner. (No it isnt just a Mosaic-ism *grin* Look at it in Lynx
too)... Infact here is a sample:
This is the 1st one in Lynx which is "suposedly" (No offence meant Lou -
just trying to avoid Mosaic as an example case - no offence NCSA either
*grin*) more HTML/HTML+ compliant:
1.0 INTRODUCTION.
__________________________________________________________________________
In order to create an effective X.500 browser for the World Wide Web
and this is in lynx in the SECOND case:
1.0 INTRODUCTION.
_________________________________________________________________
In order to create an effective X.500 browser for the World Wide Web
Question: Which looks nicer? To me the 1st case.
Question: Which is ``correct''? The 2nd.
Try it in Mosaic. The result is much the same... that extra white space
is just too much to bear.
Im not asking for that much of a redifinition (I think *grin*) all Im
asking is the certain tags (well only HR actually I think) be modified
slightly so they can exist inside the <H1|H2|H3|H4|H5|H6> tags.
Does anyone else support this move? Can anyone see any problems?
Thanks,
Paul
.-------------------------------------------------------------------------.
|_______Paul_S._Wain,_(X.500_Project_Engineer_and_WWW/HTTP_chappie),______|
| Computer Centre, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middx., UB8 3PH, ENGLAND. |
|___VOICE:_+44_895_274000_extn_2391_______EMAIL: [email protected] __|
| http://http2.brunel.ac.uk:8080/paul/ |
`-------------------------------------------------------------------------'