|Yechezkal-Shimon Gutfreund wrote:
|
|[ about mosaic applets]
|
|I see nothing in this that is especially NCSA Mosaic specific,
|although the tome of it suggests that the author is thinking
|exclusively in terms of NCSA Mosaic for X.
|
|Could I sugest that the few remaining places where X resources and
|so on are mentioned be revised ( alternatives are given anyway) so
|it applies to all versions of Mosaic; and further that it be made a
|general interface so that an applet written to the spec will also
|work with other conforming browsers on whatever platform?
|
|I feel this would then become a very valuable proposal which I
|suspect would be supported by browser implementors as it would
|reduce the burden on them from feature requests.
A valuable suggestion, but an ambitious one. When I think of
interprocess communication I cannot help but think in terms of Unix
concepts (or X). To abstract away from that and still come up with
something that works efficiently everywhere will be difficult.
Nevertheless, I am going to give it a try (I was going to, anyway),
based on the idea of a protocol that alternates commands and
responses, of variable length up to a certain maximum, and with room
for later adding new commands that won't break older versions.
It's probably too early to attempt a universal solution, but if there
is interest, I'd be happy to occasionally report on my progress.
So, who suggests the first batch of things that a `WWW control center'
and an accessory would want to exchange?
Bert
--
__________________________________
/ _ Bert Bos <[email protected]> |
() |/ \ Alfa-informatica, |
\ |\_/ Rijksuniversiteit Groningen |
\_____/| Postbus 716 |
| 9700 AS GRONINGEN |
| Nederland |
| http://tyr.let.rug.nl/~bert/ |
\__________________________________|