> Lou Montulli wrote:
>
> > I was also wondering if you have plans to index HTTP (WWW specific
> > protocal) servers as well as Gopher servers. It should be
> > very similar to what you have already done for gopher, except
> > that the web comunity would strongly prefer the use of prepared
> > index files exclusively.
>
> We're certainly considering some form of WWW indexing,
> although the lack of any real meaningful information in
> many of the HTTP links themselves makes the current
> automated approach somewhat problematic.
True, just looking at links/titles is not enough.
> We _have_ completed initial tests of a new direct WWW frontend onto
> the current system, which will make both the current anonFTP and the
> new Gopher index collections available to the WWW community without
> any need for gateways. This will be part of a new augmented archie
> service which we hope to deploy in the near future.
I'm looking forward to see this...
> We'd be happy to work with the WWW community as it defines a
> standardized mechanism for indexing files but such a project will
> have to be held up until we can get the new gopher index service
> deployed and stabilized. Hopefully this will take no more than a
> couple of months (I say with a silly grin on my face :-) at which
> point we can look to the next collection to target.
Of course there is no reason the WWW community can't start using
such a service now.
> We'll certainly be keeping your suggestion in mind and if
> in the meantime the WWW community can agree upon the
> format of indexing files and start deploying them onto the
> net, we'd be happy to mine the data as soon as we have the
> resources to do so.
Are you aware of ALIWEB? It is currently the only system that is doing
what you want: it retrieves hand-prepered IAFA templates via HTTP, and
rolls them into a searcheable database (which in turn is included in
the W3 Catalog; one of the best WWW catalogs about). Currently about
20 sites have deployed index files, and the number is growing. I am
hoping to give a talk on the upcoming WWW conference on this, which I
expect will bring it to attention of more sites.
For details see http://web.nexor.co.uk/aliweb/doc/aliweb.html
I would like to expand the discussion on the use of the IAFA templates
-- maybe a new template-type is called for, maybe not. Either way I
have some comments about them, but all attempts at initiaing a
discussion with the IAFA people have failed so far.
-- Martijn
__________
Internet: [email protected]
X-400: C=GB; A= ; P=Nexor; O=Nexor; S=koster; I=M
X-500: c=GB@o=NEXOR Ltd@cn=Martijn Koster
WWW: http://web.nexor.co.uk/mak/mak.html