This doesn't solve the problem, you could end up with lots of
http://some.machine/gifs/file.gif
http://some.oher.machine/icons/file.gif
...
on your disk.
Dave Ragget wrote:
> We are all waiting impatiently for URN's as the long term
> solution for this.
URN's are a good idea, but in order for a browser to map a URN to an
internal image you still need to define a set of URNs for "standard" icons.
So we might as well do that with URL's, which are here now, and use
URN equivalents when they arrive. Or am I missing something?
-- Martijn
__________
Internet: [email protected]
X-400: C=GB; A= ; P=Nexor; O=Nexor; S=koster; I=M
X-500: c=GB@o=NEXOR Ltd@cn=Martijn Koster
WWW: http://web.nexor.co.uk/mak/mak.html
