Re: CGI Suggestion

Charles Henrich ([email protected])
Tue, 28 Dec 1993 14:11:24 -0500 (EST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: John Franks: "Re: CGI/1.0 --- what's wrong with the status quo?"
Previous message: Marc Andreessen: "CGI Suggestion"
Maybe in reply to: Marc Andreessen: "CGI Suggestion"
Next in thread: Rob McCool: "Re: CGI Suggestion"

> This isn't going to fly as a change for URLs per se; as far as URLs
> go, everything after the third slash is opaque, which is as it should
> be. So if possible let's at least restrict this discussion to CGI.

The ;'s are meant only for the server (CGI) to interpret, not the client!

-Crh

Charles Henrich Michigan State University [email protected]

http://rs560.msu.edu/~henrich/

Next message: John Franks: "Re: CGI/1.0 --- what's wrong with the status quo?"
Previous message: Marc Andreessen: "CGI Suggestion"
Maybe in reply to: Marc Andreessen: "CGI Suggestion"
Next in thread: Rob McCool: "Re: CGI Suggestion"