HTTP/1.0 & HTML+ questions

Marc Andreessen ([email protected])
Tue, 19 Oct 93 13:39:53 -0700

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Terry Allen: "FORM, allowable contexts"
Previous message: Lou Montulli: "Re: <OWNER> tag in head? and other things that would be nice..."

"William M. Perry" writes:
> 1. When a URL has been moved, and a response code of 301, 302, or 303 has
> been returned, must the url be fully specified or could it be
> returned as Location: somefile.html, where the original URL was
> http://someserver/thisfile.html?

Let's say "fully specified", to keep things straightforward.

> 2. In HTML+, are forms allowed inside of <PRE> formatted sections?

YES!

> I know <PRE> is outdated in HTML+, but should it be allowed? If
> its not, I think it should be added to the spec - the only thing
> a <FORM> shouldn't be allowed inside of is another form.

Agreed.

Marc

Next message: Terry Allen: "FORM, allowable contexts"
Previous message: Lou Montulli: "Re: <OWNER> tag in head? and other things that would be nice..."