>
> I thought I'd offer a suggestion on IMG ALT="" since
> you are implementing it now. It seems to me that there
> ought to be 3 possible results:
>
> TAG DISPLAYS
>
> IMG (no ALT attribute) [IMAGE]
> IMG ALT="" <no display>
> IMG ALT=string [string]
>
> I'd like to see the second result implemented because
> it may not make sense for us to indicate
> that an image is there. For instance, our home page uses
> a tiled graphic as a kind of logo. There are
> actually six image tags used to create it. In the character-mode,
> I'd rather drop the logo altogether rather than display
> six tags.
>
I agree this sounds resonable. Some may complain that [IMAGE] should
not be displayed at all, so if no ALT is given show nothing.
I think having [IMAGE] appear is better because there are alot of
existing documents that can't be viewed without some form of image
place holder, and having [IMAGE] come up in documents will help to
remind people to put in ALT's for their IMG tags.
:lou
-- ************************************************************************** * T H E U N I V E R S I T Y O F K A N S A S * * Lou MONTULLI @ Ukanaix.cc.ukans.edu * * Kuhub.cc.ukans.edu ACS Computing Services * * 913/864-0436 Ukanvax.bitnet Lawrence, KS 66044 * * UNIX! Cool! I know that! Jurassic Park - The Movie * **************************************************************************