Re: SGML objects

Bob Stayton ([email protected])
Fri, 13 Aug 93 10:26:03 PDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: William C Fenner: "Re: solution time for www/smtp hole"
Previous message: Charles Henrich: "Re: solution time for www/smtp hole"
Maybe in reply to: Lou Burnard: "SGML objects"
Next in thread: Steve Heaney: "Re: SGML objects"

I've heard several people asking for nested section
containers in HTML+. Could one of you please explain
how you would break up a very large hierarchical
document into small enough file pieces to be
useable over the Internet? How would each file
piece be marked up? I posted this question
recently and got zero response.

I'm for proper use of SGML, but this seems to be
a serious problem with nested containers (unless
I'm missing something). Dave Raggett's GROUP tag
in HTML+ seems to be an elegant solution. I'm
curious what the SGML experts think of it.

bobs

Next message: William C Fenner: "Re: solution time for www/smtp hole"
Previous message: Charles Henrich: "Re: solution time for www/smtp hole"
Maybe in reply to: Lou Burnard: "SGML objects"
Next in thread: Steve Heaney: "Re: SGML objects"