> The ultimate goal was to define HTML and HTTP/1.0 at a fine enough
> level that we could issue RFC's and have a stable base to build on.
What's the status of this? There are interesting developments afoot
that I want to follow closely.
> Other goals were to study the HTML+ proposed RFC and define what
> could be done and what could not
Any news of a browser/etc for HTML+?
> We also talked about how to define Style Guides so authors could
> provide hints to browsers about how to render their documents best. A
> new annotation protocol was also designed.
Descriptions of either?
> * Scanned images of all attendees (except marca) online :-)
Why not marca? :)
> * The <LINK REL="Style" HREF="..."> for style guides (in my
> print-out it has <LINK STYLE="...">).
Explain?
> <BR>
> I forget what this was supposed to be, I think it means force a
> line break
But that's presentation! :-) :-) :-) :-)
> <HR>
> Horizontal rule, replaces use of ---------------------
See above! :-) :-) :-) :-)
> allow nested lists (DL NL DL)
> ala NCSA Mosaic
Hallelujah!
> <IMG ALT="text to display if you can't display the image" SRC="" ISMAP>
Ought to be mandatory :) Some of us dial in, you know :)
> White Space is to be folded
> This means "foo bar" should render the same as "foo bar".
Yes! Will this also get rid of the annoying libwww whitespace
irregularities around <DL>s? (see
http://www.vuw.ac.nz/campus/publications/Salient/1993/18/home.html for
an example)
> Authoring Tools
> ---------------
What kind(s) of authoring tools are we looking for? Could an idealist
please post a list of wanted features for would-be developers to work
with?
Thanks for the notes. Who were the Official Note Takers?
Nat