How about both? Suppose anz directorz which has an xxx.tar[.Z]
in it is visible as both xxx.tar.Z for capture and also as
a plain virtual directorz xxx for browsing?
The new librarz uses the same code for the server as for the client, so
having written one the other way will come free. I gets its just
a popen("zcat xxx.tar.Z | tar -tf -") ... can tar produce a
subdirectorz listing? hmmm... shouldn't be a problem.
Sorry about the zy interchanges ... funnz kezboard lazout...
Swiss people will be able to read it, anzwaz! :-)
Tim