*** Start of undeliverable message ***
Message:
999999999
From: [email protected]@INTERNET at SMTPCC
Date: 04/13/95 03:04AM
To: roberta alberding at OCCSPOST
*** Unknown message recipient ***
Subject:
Contents:
*** No message recipients ***
999999999
Text item:
1442
Once upon a time you, Trond Are Undem, wrote:
-->
--> On Tue, 4 Apr 1995, Jeffrey Hobbs wrote:
-->
--> > >What's right to use according to the standard and standards to come of
--> > >the following:
--> > >
--> > > <P></P>, <LI></LI>, <DT></DT>, <DD></DD>
--> > >
--> > >or without closing tags
--> >
--> > Browsers should handle these with or without closing tags, but editors
--> > _should_ generate perfect HTML, meaning they should write it out with
--> > close tags.
-->
--> I see ... thanks for your help :)
-->
Well, not having the closing tags for <P>, <LI> etc *is* perfect HTML.
>From the DTD:
<!ELEMENT P - O (%text)+>
<!ELEMENT DT - O (%text)+>
<!ELEMENT DD - O %flow;>
<!ELEMENT LI - O %flow; -- list item -->
The `-' after the element name indicates the opening tag is required,
the `O' in the second field after the name indicates the closing tag
is optional. Hence, using <P>, <LI>, <DT> and <DD> without </P>,
</LI>, </DT> and </DD> *is* perfect HTML.
Abigail
--------------- Start RFC822 Headers ---------------
Received: by occshost.nlm.nih.gov (5.65+/1.3)
id 21803.AA; Thu, 13 Apr 95 03:04:01 GMT
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 95 03:04:01 GMT
From: [email protected]@occshost
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Content-Length: 0
Apparently-To: <[email protected]>
--------------- End RFC822 Headers ---------------